Free for AP English Teachers — AP Lang & AP Lit

Free AP English Teacher PowerPoint Library

Complete classroom kits, not just slides. Every PowerPoint on this page comes with bell ringers, exit tickets, AP-style multiple choice, timed writing prompts, rubrics, and pacing guides — everything you need to open your laptop Monday morning and teach.

Free, editable, and aligned to the current AP English course framework. Updated throughout the school year so you always have what you need before each new unit.

100% Free Classroom Use Editable .pptx Files AP Lang & AP Lit Updated All Year
📦 Browse All Kits Teach This Tomorrow → Free Toolkit
Diane Powers, AP English educational reviewer
Diane's Teaching Tip Reviewed by Diane Powers • 29 Years Teaching Experience

The best AP English PowerPoint isn't the one with the most slides—it's the one that gets students talking, writing, and defending their thinking. During my years in the classroom, I learned that presentations should start conversations rather than replace them. I often used a slide to introduce a passage, a rhetorical choice, or a literary concept, and then paused to let students explain, debate, annotate, or write before moving on. Those discussions usually revealed misconceptions that I never would have noticed by lecturing through the entire presentation. If you're using these free classroom resources, don't feel like you have to cover every slide in one class period. Skip, reorder, add your own examples, and adapt them to fit your students. The most effective AP English lessons are flexible because every class develops at its own pace, and the strongest learning happens when students actively engage with the material instead of simply watching it.

Complete Classroom Kits

AP English PowerPoint Library

Every kit includes slides, student-facing materials, and assessment tools. Download one file and you have everything for that lesson.

AP Lang

Rhetorical Analysis

45 slides  ·  1–2 class periods

  • 45-slide editable PowerPoint with worked passage examples
  • Guided student notes (fill-in-the-blank and open-response)
  • Bell ringer: identify the rhetorical situation from an opening line
  • Exit ticket: write one commentary sentence about a provided device
  • AP-style multiple choice: 8 passage-based questions
  • Timed writing prompt: full FRQ 2 with 40-minute timer slide
  • Rubric: Row A/B/C with student-facing language
  • Teacher pacing suggestions: 50-min, 75-min, and 90-min versions
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang

Synthesis Essay

38 slides  ·  1–2 class periods

  • 38-slide editable PowerPoint: source integration, attribution verbs, argument structure
  • Source analysis worksheet: students annotate perspective and bias before writing
  • Bell ringer: determine whether a sentence is synthesis or summary
  • Exit ticket: cite one source using the correct attribution verb for its rhetorical posture
  • AP-style multiple choice: 6 source-set-based comprehension questions
  • Timed writing prompt: full FRQ 1 with six sources and 40-minute timer
  • Rubric: annotated Row B language for synthesis-specific evidence standards
  • Pacing: suggested day 1 / day 2 split with reading vs. writing focus
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang

Argument Essay

42 slides  ·  1–2 class periods

  • 42-slide PowerPoint: claim structure, qualify vs. defend, warrant-building, line of reasoning
  • Thesis workshop: six student thesis samples sorted by rubric score with annotations
  • Bell ringer: identify whether a prompt invites defense, challenge, or qualification
  • Exit ticket: revise a 2-level thesis into a defensible claim in 3 minutes
  • AP-style multiple choice: 5 argument-structure identification questions
  • Timed writing prompt: full FRQ 3 with “defend, challenge, or qualify” stem
  • Rubric: Row A emphasis — what “defensible” means with anchoring examples
  • Pacing: 15-min pre-write model built into the slide flow
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lit

Poetry Analysis

40 slides  ·  1–2 class periods

  • 40-slide PowerPoint: volta-first reading, scansion basics, paraphrase-to-analysis bridge
  • Annotation model: two poems fully annotated with layer-by-layer reading commentary
  • Bell ringer: identify the volta in a 14-line poem and describe what shifts
  • Exit ticket: write one sentence of analysis about a specific image (not paraphrase)
  • AP-style multiple choice: 8 poetry passage-based questions
  • Timed writing prompt: full FRQ 1 with 40-minute timer and blank annotation space
  • Rubric: AP Lit Row B annotated — what paraphrase vs. analysis looks like in a scored essay
  • Pacing: first-read, annotation, discussion, and timed write mapped to 75-min period
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lit

Prose Fiction Analysis

36 slides  ·  1–2 class periods

  • 36-slide PowerPoint: narrative distance, unreliable narration, free indirect discourse, prose style as characterization
  • Passage comparison: same scene in first-person vs. third-limited, students identify what changes analytically
  • Bell ringer: determine whether a passage uses omniscient or limited narration and explain what is withheld
  • Exit ticket: identify one word in a provided passage doing more than its literal job, explain the gap
  • AP-style multiple choice: 8 prose passage questions emphasizing narrator reliability
  • Timed writing prompt: full FRQ 2 with contemporary prose excerpt
  • Rubric: Row B annotated with prose-specific evidence standards
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lit

Literary Argument (FRQ 3)

34 slides  ·  1 class period

  • 34-slide PowerPoint: text selection strategy, concept-to-thesis bridge, plot summary vs. literary argument
  • Text preparation guide: how to build a “prepared texts” repertoire for common FRQ 3 concept categories
  • Bell ringer: match a literary concept prompt to the best of three possible text choices and defend the selection
  • Exit ticket: write a FRQ 3 thesis for a provided concept prompt using a text students know
  • Timed writing prompt: two FRQ 3 options with different concept emphases, 40-minute timer
  • Rubric: Row A emphasis — what “literary merit” means and how it affects text selection
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang & Lit

Rhetorical & Literary Devices

52 slides  ·  2–3 class periods

  • 52-slide PowerPoint: 30 core devices with exam-wording examples, the device-identification vs. analysis distinction, and how to choose between near-synonyms on the exam
  • Device identification drill: 15 passage fragments, students identify the device and write one analysis sentence
  • Bell ringer series (5 cards): one device per day for a full week, each with an exam-wording scenario
  • Exit ticket: given a device and a passage, write the analysis sentence (not the identification)
  • AP-style multiple choice: 12 device identification and contextual function questions
  • Student reference card: one-page take-home with 30 devices, definitions, and near-synonym distinctions
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang & Lit

Rubric Deep Dive

30 slides  ·  1 class period

  • 30-slide PowerPoint: Row A/B/C unpacked with specific language from official scoring guidelines, common ways students miss each row, and the sophistication point decoded
  • Anchor paper analysis: four student essays scored by the class before revealing anchor scores and commentary
  • Bell ringer: given one paragraph, identify which rubric row(s) it is earning and which it is missing
  • Exit ticket: student writes their own rubric-referenced self-assessment of a recent essay
  • Self-assessment form: reproducible checklist tied to Row A, B, and C language for post-essay reflection
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang & LitNew

The Sophistication Point

28 slides  ·  1 class period

  • 28-slide PowerPoint: what the sophistication point actually requires, the four moves that earn it, and the common misconception that complexity of vocabulary = sophistication
  • Essay revision workshop: pairs of paragraphs at the 4-level and 5-level, students identify the specific addition that earns sophistication
  • Bell ringer: read a conclusion paragraph, decide if it earns the sophistication point, explain in one sentence
  • Exit ticket: revise a provided conclusion paragraph to earn the sophistication point without changing the essay’s core argument
  • Complexity pattern reference: 12 specific analytical moves the rubric rewards as sophistication markers
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang & Lit

Multiple Choice Strategies

32 slides  ·  1 class period

  • 32-slide PowerPoint: passage-based question strategies, distractor patterns, best-answer vs. correct-answer framing, and time management across 45 questions
  • Distractor deconstruction: 8 questions with all four answer choices annotated for why each is correct or incorrect
  • Bell ringer: given a question and two plausible answer choices, identify the textual evidence that distinguishes them
  • Exit ticket: students write one question about a provided passage, then exchange and answer each other’s
  • Pacing guide: suggested time allocation with built-in decision rules for when to skip and return
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang & Lit

Tone, Diction & Connotation

35 slides  ·  1–2 class periods

  • 35-slide PowerPoint: 60+ tone words organized by register, the denotation/connotation distinction, diction analysis protocol, and the “word swap” technique
  • Word swap drill: 10 sentence pairs where one word differs — students identify the tonal shift and name both tones precisely
  • Bell ringer: replace “the author uses negative language” with a sentence that names the tone precisely and cites the specific word
  • Exit ticket: given a passage, identify the dominant tone and name three specific words that create it
  • Take-home: tone word reference organized into six emotional registers with distinction notes for near-synonyms
Download Kit Preview →
AP Lang & Lit

Passage Analysis Protocol

30 slides  ·  1 class period

  • 30-slide PowerPoint: the four-layer reading model, five targeted annotation passes, and the observation-to-thesis reasoning process
  • Live annotation model: one passage annotated step by step as a whole-class activity
  • Bell ringer: given a passage segment, identify which of the four reading layers is being engaged by a provided analysis sentence
  • Exit ticket: in three minutes, write a rough thesis from a set of four annotated observations
  • Student annotation guide: reproducible one-page reference for the five-pass annotation system
Download Kit Preview →

How to use these kits without following the slide order

Each kit is built as a complete teaching framework, but experienced AP teachers rarely use every slide. Think of the PowerPoint as a resource library: use the bell ringer regardless of whether you run the full presentation that day, pull the timed write prompt for homework, or use just the multiple choice questions for a quick review. Every element within a kit works independently. The pacing guide in each kit suggests how to reassemble the components for different class period lengths and teaching contexts.

Teach This Tomorrow

Complete period plans — open this Sunday night, teach it Monday morning

Every plan maps the same five-move structure to a different AP English topic. The timing is tested for both 50-minute and 75-minute periods, with a cut line marked for each.

Rhetorical Analysis — First Lesson

AP Lang  ·  50–75 min  ·  Works with any nonfiction passage

5min
Bell Ringer

The rhetorical situation in one sentence

Project: “Read the introductory note for today’s passage. In one sentence, name the speaker, the occasion, and the most likely audience. What do you predict the speaker wants?” Students write independently, then share. Takes exactly 5 minutes if you hold the share to 90 seconds.

12min
PowerPoint

The four-layer reading model (slides 1–12)

Teach Layers 1–3 with examples from a passage the class has already read. Key slide: the counterfactual question — “What would be different if the author had made a different choice here?” That question is the engine of analysis. Students should write it in their notes.

12min
Small Group

Annotation pass on today’s passage

Groups of 3. Each group runs Pass 2 only: circle every word doing more than its literal job. At the 8-minute mark, groups share one circled word and explain the connotative gap. Teacher writes the best ones on the board. These become the evidence pool for the timed write.

15min
Timed Write

One body paragraph only — FRQ 2 format

Prompt: “Write one body paragraph that makes a specific analytical claim about a rhetorical choice in today’s passage and develops it with specific evidence and commentary.” Timer on screen. Students who finish early: write the analysis sentence without the quote. This is harder and better practice.

6min
Exit Ticket

The so-what test on their own paragraph

Students read their timed-write paragraph and underline the sentence that answers “so what?” — the sentence that names what the evidence reveals rather than restating it. If they can’t underline anything, they haven’t done the analytical step yet. This is the fastest diagnostic for commentary quality.

Synthesis Essay — Source Integration

AP Lang  ·  50–75 min  ·  Works with any FRQ 1 source set

5min
Bell Ringer

Summary vs. synthesis in one sentence

Project two sentences: (A) “Source B argues that renewable energy has decreased in cost.” (B) “While Source B presents declining costs as evidence of progress, Source E complicates this by noting that cost reduction has not correlated with expanded access in rural areas.” Ask: which is synthesis? Why? Students answer in writing. 3 minutes writing, 2 minutes share.

10min
PowerPoint

Source triangulation: combining three sources in one paragraph

Slides 8–18. The key model: one source establishes a fact, a second complicates it, a third resolves or deepens the complication. Show this on the board with three source fragments. Students copy the three-source paragraph template into their notes — this becomes their Synthesis FRQ scaffold.

12min
Partner Activity

Assign roles: Source Reader & Claim Builder

Partner A reads two assigned sources and summarizes each in one sentence. Partner B builds a claim that both sources could support. They then draft the first sentence of a synthesis paragraph together: claim + first source + attribution verb. The attribution verb drill: try it with “argues,” “acknowledges,” and “warns” and note how each changes the logical relationship.

15min
Timed Write

One synthesis body paragraph, three sources required

Students write one body paragraph using exactly three sources (minimum two from today’s partner work). Timer on screen. Requirement: the claim must appear in the first sentence, not emerge at the end. After 12 minutes, students circle the attribution verb in each source introduction and confirm each source is doing a different logical job in the paragraph.

8min
Exit Ticket

Attribution verb audit

Students highlight every attribution verb in their paragraph. Do the three verbs they used describe three different rhetorical postures? Can they explain why each source’s verb is accurate based on what that source actually does? This audit forces close re-reading of source purpose, the key skill the Synthesis rubric is assessing.

Poetry Analysis — Reading the Volta

AP Lit  ·  50–75 min  ·  Works with any formal poem

5min
Bell Ringer

The before-and-after sentence

Project today’s poem. Students read it once and write: “Before line __, the speaker [emotion/situation]. After line __, the speaker [different emotion/situation].” The blank is where they locate the volta. Don’t give them the word “volta” yet — they should identify the turn by feeling it first. You’ll name it in the PowerPoint section.

10min
PowerPoint

Volta, form, and the paraphrase-to-analysis bridge

Slides 1–15. Name what the students just found: that’s the volta. Show the Petrarchan vs. Shakespearean structural difference and where to look for each type’s turn. The key teaching moment: paraphrase of before/after is not analysis. The analysis is in HOW the language makes the turn feel — the specific words, images, or sounds that enact the shift rather than just describing it.

10min
Whole Class

Line-by-line annotation of the volta moment

Focus the class on the three lines immediately surrounding the volta. Ask: what specific words, sounds, or syntactic choices create the sense of turning? Students annotate independently for 4 minutes, then share. Teacher writes on board: which observations are layer-3 analysis (specific word choices) vs. layer-1 paraphrase. The distinction is live and immediate.

15min
Timed Write

One body paragraph: analyzing the volta

Prompt: “Write one paragraph analyzing how a specific poetic choice at or near the volta creates the poem’s central turn in meaning or tone.” No paraphrase allowed in the first sentence — must open with an analytical claim. After 12 minutes, students underline their thesis claim and check: does it name a specific poetic choice, or does it describe what the poem is about?

5min
Exit Ticket

The paraphrase-or-analysis test

Students copy their analytical claim sentence onto an index card. On the back: “Could this sentence have been written without reading the poem carefully? (yes/no) Does it name a specific word or structural choice? (yes/no)” Two yeses on the back = it’s analysis. Two nos = it’s paraphrase. Collect the cards. Tomorrow’s bell ringer: project the best three claim sentences anonymously.

Argument Essay — The Qualify Move

AP Lang  ·  50–75 min  ·  Works with any FRQ 3 prompt

5min
Bell Ringer

Defend, challenge, or qualify — quick sort

Project a claim: “The most important skill a student can develop is the ability to work independently.” Students write one sentence responding in each mode: one defending, one challenging, one qualifying. Share the qualify responses only — these are the hardest and the most interesting. Ask: what specific condition makes the claim true in the qualify version?

10min
PowerPoint

What “qualify” means in rubric terms

Slides 14–24. The key teaching: a qualified position is not a weak one. It is a more precise one — agreeing with part of a claim while naming the condition under which another part fails. Show the thesis comparison: “Independent work is valuable” vs. “Independent work develops the self-monitoring skills that collaborative work cannot, though it fails students who lack a baseline of structured instruction on which to draw.” Ask which is more defensible. The qualified one is easier to prove, not harder.

10min
Partner Workshop

Thesis revision: add the qualifying clause

Each student writes their bell-ringer qualify response as a full thesis sentence. Partners read each other’s and do one thing: identify the specific condition named and test whether it is precise enough to be provable. “Except in some cases” is not a qualifying clause — it has no content. “Except for students in the first year of a new skill domain who lack the metacognitive framework to assess their own errors independently” is a qualifying clause.

15min
Timed Write

Full introduction + one body paragraph, qualify position

Students must take a qualified position, not a binary one. The qualifying condition from their partner workshop becomes the backbone of the introduction. First body paragraph: prove the part of the claim they are agreeing with. Timer on screen. After 12 minutes: have they committed to a specific condition, or are they still using vague hedging language like “in some ways”?

5min
Exit Ticket

Name the condition

Students write one sentence: “My argument qualifies the original claim by limiting it to [specific condition]. Without this condition, the claim [fails/becomes trivially true/requires different evidence].” If they can’t complete this template cleanly, their thesis is not actually a qualification — it’s hedging. This ticket tells you immediately who has the concept and who needs another day on it.

Free Teacher Toolkit

Standalone classroom tools — download individually or as a full bundle

Each toolkit resource works independently from any particular PowerPoint. Use them with your own materials or plug them into the classroom kits above.

◉

Bell Ringer Bank

“Read this thesis: ‘The author uses vivid imagery to convey emotion.’ Rewrite it so it makes a specific, arguable claim rather than describing what the essay will cover.”
180 bell ringers — 20 per major AP topic — projectable format
☐

Exit Ticket Pack

“Circle the word in today’s passage that is doing the most analytical work. In one sentence, explain what connotative gap it creates that a neutral synonym would not.”
90 exit tickets — 10 per topic — printable half-sheet format
▶

Mini-Lesson Slides

10-minute standalone lesson: “The attribution verb as an analytical signal — how ‘acknowledges,’ ‘implies,’ and ‘warns’ each change the logical relationship between a source and your argument.”
40 mini-lessons — 5–12 slides each — editable .pptx
❓

Discussion Question Sets

“The speaker concedes the strongest version of the opposing argument in paragraph three. What does this rhetorical choice cost her in credibility, and what does it gain? Could she have structured the concession differently to achieve the same effect with less cost?”
60 discussion question sets — 5 questions each — Socratic and small-group formats
⌛

Timed Write Prompts

FRQ 2 format: “In the following passage, a scientist testifies before a Senate subcommittee about climate modeling uncertainty. Read the passage carefully. Write an essay that analyzes the rhetorical choices she makes to maintain credibility while conceding significant epistemic limits.”
48 projectable prompts — with 40-min, 25-min, and 15-min timer slides
☑

Peer Review Checklists

Row B Peer Review: “1. Underline the analytical claim in the first sentence of each body paragraph. 2. Put a box around each piece of evidence. 3. Check: does the commentary after each piece of evidence say something the evidence does not already say? Write ‘yes’ or ‘restate’ next to each commentary sentence.”
12 checklists — printable — rubric-tied language throughout
📝

Rubrics

Student-facing Row B rubric: “4 points: Commentary consistently explains how specific textual evidence supports the argument, using language that names the analytical function of each choice rather than restating the evidence’s content.”
8 printable rubrics — AP Lang and AP Lit versions — teacher and student-facing language
📄

Student Reflection Forms

“After reading your scored essay: What was your commentary doing in the paragraph you are most satisfied with? What specific sentence in your least successful paragraph is doing restatement rather than analysis? What would you need to know or ask to change that sentence?”
6 post-essay reflection forms — printable — rubric-referenced throughout
Diane Powers
Diane Powers
Certified AP English Teacher — Master’s from Baker University

Diane’s Teaching Note: Never use every slide

The most common mistake teachers tell me they make with presentation-based lessons is treating the slide deck as a script and following it sequentially until time runs out. I build these presentations to be frameworks, not scripts, and I want to be direct about how I actually use them in my own classroom.

In a 50-minute period, I routinely use 12 to 18 slides out of a 40-slide deck. I choose the slides that match where my students actually are, not where the sequence assumes they are. If the bell ringer tells me students already understand the basic distinction I was planning to teach, I skip to the application slide. If I see three students writing exactly the same kind of comma-splice analytical sentence in their timed write, I stop the timer and spend four minutes on the specific structural problem I just diagnosed — which is more valuable than the next three slides in the sequence.

The presentations are built so you can do this. Every slide works as a standalone moment. The bell ringers can be projected without running any other slides. The timed write prompts can be used on days when you are not using the PowerPoint at all. Think of each kit as a week’s worth of classroom material that you will distribute across multiple periods, not a single period’s script.

The “Teach This Tomorrow” plans are the exception: those are genuinely designed to be followed as written, because they are sequenced based on the specific cognitive load of each activity and the way each step prepares for the next one. If you follow those plans, the timing and structure are deliberate and tested. But for the full PowerPoint kits, use them as the resource library they are, not the lesson plan they resemble.

Classroom Calendar

AP English year-at-a-glance — when to use which kits

This is the pacing calendar I use as a starting framework, built for a school that begins instruction in late August and takes the AP exam in mid-May. Adjust for your first day of instruction and your district’s local assessment calendar.

Aug–Sep
Rhetorical Analysis Foundation
Rhetorical situation, four reading layers, annotation protocol
October
Synthesis & Source Integration
Source triangulation, attribution verbs, argument-from-sources
November
Argument Essay
Claim structure, qualify move, line of reasoning, warrant
December
Devices & Tone Vocabulary
Rhetorical & literary devices, tone precision, diction analysis
January
AP Lit — Poetry
Volta, scansion, paraphrase-to-analysis, FRQ 1 practice
February
AP Lit — Prose Fiction
Narrative distance, unreliable narration, prose style, FRQ 2
March
Literary Argument & Rubric
FRQ 3 text selection, rubric deep dive, sophistication point
April
Multiple Choice & Full Practice
Distractor patterns, timed practice exams, self-scoring
May
Exam Week Prep
Last-minute rescue, timing strategy, reader-perspective review

How to adapt this calendar to your first day

The calendar above assumes 36 weeks of instruction beginning in late August. If your school starts earlier, you have time to build in a second pass through rhetorical analysis in October before moving to synthesis, which I recommend for any class that includes a significant number of students who have not taken AP English before. If your school starts in September, compress the August-September foundation unit to three weeks and move the Argument Essay unit to early November. The kits work in any order — the calendar is a pacing suggestion, not a dependency chain.

Student Resources Linked From Every Kit

Every PowerPoint links to these — keep students on the site between class sessions

These links live on the final slide of every classroom kit, so students can continue practicing independently with the same resources you used in class.

Practice Questions Essay Database Evidence Bank 280 Flashcards Vocabulary Guide Passage Analysis Score Calculator Last-Minute Rescue What Readers Notice Prompt Lab Complexity Patterns Exam Intelligence
Monthly Update Schedule

New materials added throughout the school year — bookmark this page

June — New Argument Essay Slides July — New AP Lit Poetry Slides August — Back-to-School Full Bundle September — Rhetorical Devices Update October — Synthesis Source Integration Update November — Argument Essay Qualify Slides December — Multiple Choice Strategy Update January — AP Lit Poetry & Prose Updates February — Literary Argument FRQ 3 Update March — Rubric Deep Dive Refresh April — Exam Preparation Bundle May — Post-Exam Reflection Materials
FAQ

Questions about the free AP English teacher resources

Do I need to create an account or provide my email to download?

No. Every file on this page is directly downloadable — click the download button and the file downloads immediately. No account, no email, no paywall. If you want to be notified when new materials are added, the easiest way is to bookmark this page and check the “Recently Updated” section at the top, which is updated whenever new materials are released.

Can I use these materials with students at other schools, or share them with colleagues?

Yes. The classroom use policy allows free use across any classroom context, sharing with colleagues at the same or different schools, and posting to a class website for student access. The materials may not be redistributed commercially or posted to commercial resource-sharing platforms. See the Classroom Use Policy for the complete terms.

The PowerPoint files are editable — does that mean I can remove the branding?

The files are editable in every sense: you can remove, add, rearrange, or modify any slide. If your school has a specific template requirement, you can adapt the content to fit it. The one request: please do not redistribute a heavily edited version as your own original work or sell it. Beyond that, edit freely to serve your students.

Are these materials appropriate for students who are taking AP English for the first time, or are they designed for experienced AP students?

Both. The kit system is explicitly designed to work at different entry points. The foundation-level kits (Rhetorical Analysis, Passage Analysis Protocol, Rhetorical & Literary Devices) build from first principles and work for students who have never read an AP rubric before. The skill-deepening kits (Sophistication Point, Rubric Deep Dive, Multiple Choice Strategies) assume students are already familiar with basic essay structure and want to move from the 3–4 range into the 5–6 range. Use the classroom calendar above as a guide for sequencing, and pull in the foundation kits any time a skill gap becomes visible in student writing.

The timed write prompts in the kits — are they official released AP prompts?

No. The prompts are original prompts written for this resource, modeled on the task language, format, and scope of official AP FRQ prompts but not reproduced from official materials. Official released AP prompts are available through College Board resources and your AP Classroom access. Using the prompts in these kits alongside official released prompts gives students the broadest possible range of practice with unfamiliar material, which is the closest preparation to the cold-read experience of exam day.